Forms of (Dis)Affection: Martí­n Kohan’s Dos veces junio

Main Article Content

Silvana Mandolessi

Abstract

This article analyzes the novel Dos veces junio (2002) by Martí­n Kohan drawing on affect theory. The narrator of Dos veces junio is characterized by the absence, suppression, wavering or suspension of affects. Assuming that affective responses necessarily correspond to the historical moment and the sphere from which they emerge, the article explores (dis)affection as an essential component of the authoritarian regime that the novel portrays. I argue that affect is not only essential to illuminate a historical epoch but also the way in which the past survives in the present since affective inscriptions are, as Ricoeur contends, the depositary of the most hidden but most original meaning of memory.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mandolessi, S. (2020). Forms of (Dis)Affection: Martí­n Kohan’s Dos veces junio. Aletheia, 11(21), e066. https://doi.org/10.24215/18533701e066
Section
Dossier: Literaturas, memorias, testimonios

References

Berger, J. (2002). The ambiguity of the photograph. En K. Askew & R. R. Wilk (Eds.), The Anthropology of Media: A Reader (pp. 47–55). Oxford: Blackwell. Retrieved from https://izzypercy.wordpress.com/john-berger-ambiguity-of-the-photograph-18-10-17/

Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel Optimism. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Berlant, L. (2015). Structures of Unfeeling: Mysterious Skin. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 28(3), pp. 191–213. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-014-9190-y

Dalmaroni, M. (2004). La palabra justa: Literatura, crí­tica y memoria en la Argentina, 1960-2002. Mar del Plata/Santiago de Chile: Melusina.

De Cauwer, S. (2017). Utopia. En J. de Bloois, S. De Cauwer, & A. Masschelein (Eds.), 50 key terms in contemporary cultural theory (pp. 297–301). Kalmthout: Pelckmans Pro.

Erll, A. (2011). Memory in culture (S. B. Young, Trans.). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

Gregg, M., & Seigworth, G. J. (Eds.). (2010). The affect theory reader. Durham: Duke university press.

Hardt, M. (2007). Foreword: What Affects Are Good For. En P. T. Clough & J. Halley (Eds.), The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social (pp. ix–xiii). Durham: Duke university press.

Hogan, P. C. (2011a). Affective Narratology: The Emotional Structure of Stories. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.

Hogan, P. C. (2011b). What Literature Teaches Us About Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Houen, A. (2011). Introduction: Affecting words. Textual Practice, 25(2), pp. 215–232. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236X.2011.552288

Houen, A. (Ed.). (2020). Affect and Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jameson, F. (2012). Antinomies of the Realism-Modernism Debate. Modern Language Quarterly, 73(3), pp. 475–485.

Kohan, M. (2005). Dos veces junio. Buenos Aires: Debolsillo.

Kohan, M. (2009). Ciencias Morales / Martí­n Kohanen Cuentomilibro.com [Youtube]. Recuperado de: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WmDoucm6h4&t=264s

Ricoeur, P., Blamey, K., & Pellauer, D. (2009). Memory, History, Forgetting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Rothberg, M. (2019). The Implicated Subject: Beyond Victims and Perpetrators. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Vermeulen, P. (2015). Contemporary literature and the end of the novel: Creature, affect, form. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.